Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics82.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '17 at 17:04
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 280
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 764
74% 609 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.9% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 115
Parallax 94.9
85% 105 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 101
79% 96.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: OC34L5TM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,095
Write 637
Mixed 744
182% 825 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 17.1
132% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 15.1
56% 116 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 128%
Great: 159%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
502GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
30GB free
Firmware: CC34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 80.3
Mixed 77.8
63% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 56%
VM0500EBQHB 500GB
26GB free
Firmware: HPG0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 85.6
Mixed 105
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.35
87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 163
Mixed 149
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.87
4K Mixed 0.17
97% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
300GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 80.6
121% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.21
64% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 33.4
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 32.2
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $772
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback