Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '21 at 17:53
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 82.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 234 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 468 62% 466 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.2 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.6% Above average	Lighting 67 Reflection 63.5 Parallax 91.8 55% 74.1 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 73.1 Splatting 47.4 49% 61 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 245GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 147 126 55 57 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 1,266 Write 903 Mixed 816 SusWrite 191 176% 794 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 54.6 189% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 612 DQ Mixed 215 236% 385 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 209%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 930GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 197 201 199 202 200 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 125 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 199 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 35,395 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 34.6 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 23.3 SC Write 37.5 SC Mixed 27.5 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	396x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16