| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP EliteBook 8560p (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1618 |
| Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180213 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 25 '21 at 18:20 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.3%
Good
|
64% 110 Pts
|
44% 347 Pts
|
25% 404 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
29% 38.1 fps
|
28% 34.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 153 192 149 183 MB/s
|
41.2%
Average
|
57% 254 MB/s
|
40% 16.9 MB/s
|
55% 130 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
465GB free
Firmware: GH2OA440
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 124 130 130 131 131 MB/s
|
71.5%
Very good
|
74% 102 MB/s
|
126% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
48% 83.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteBook 8560p Builds (Compare 246 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteBook 8560p
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 67x |
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 65x |
| Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples | 117x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 85x |
| Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $30 |