Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 18:08
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 266
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 501
66% 494 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$55
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 54 52 71 99 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 424
Write 332
Mixed 317
SusWrite 77.7
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 16.9
67% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 48.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
11% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905713-018.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback