Pcnet DQ67SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPcnet DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181024
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 16:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 472
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 41.3
36% 44 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 36.9
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M8VC + 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 301 307 314 315 315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 466
Write 412
Mixed 303
SusWrite 292
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 31.1
109% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 117
137% 236 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-EDJ1C F3-12800CL9-4GBSR SLA302G08-EDJ1C F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Pcnet DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback