Asrock X99 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '17 at 23:55
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 75
2-Core 151
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 605
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 1,515
94% 1,515 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.4% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 149
Parallax 129
100% 133 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 138
Splatting 109
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
802GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 410
Mixed 417
98% 443 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 42.5
153% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 128
128% 207 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 165
Write 177
Mixed 729
82% 357 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 28.9
89% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 113
135% 235 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 144%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
957GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 160
Mixed 159
122% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
309GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 93.9
Mixed 101
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.28
83% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 76%
Asmt ASM1351 500GB
208GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.7% Good
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 104
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.23
79% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FAR 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
135% Outstanding
MC Read 61.7
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 51.6
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 15.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 135%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 OC Formula Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $420
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback