Alienware m15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAlienware m15  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0900DH
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201020
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 23:33
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 214
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 665
63% 523 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.87
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 81.3
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 90.9
66% 87.3 fps
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 76.1
67% 76.1 fps
Poor: 49% Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$37
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 149 161 169 168 199 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 1,253
Write 105
Mixed 181
SusWrite 160
91% 425 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 18.7
76% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 594
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 166
165% 279 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 216%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 991GB
226GB free, PID 00d9
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 21 48 59 57 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 304
Write 114
Mixed 181
SusWrite 50.1
189% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Mixed 3.7
190% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
47GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 17 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Read 26.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 15.9
19% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.8
67% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 41%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
34GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 16 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Read 27.3
Write 0.2
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 16.3
20% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.3
68% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 41%
SanDisk Ultra 248GB
40GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 51 51 27 12 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 97.3
Write 44
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 34.4
59% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.2
78% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FD1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 26.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 23.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical m15 Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware m15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $33
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback