MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 16:57
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 338
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 663
8-Core 1,224
113% 944 Pts
64-Core 2,276
141% 2,276 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 242
Parallax 272
229% 265 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 234
Splatting 171
186% 236 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,516
Write 2,393
Mixed 1,698
490% 2,202 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 89.8
300% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,406
DQ Write 1,242
DQ Mixed 1,315
989% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
669GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 453 453 453 453 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 449
Mixed 405
SusWrite 453
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 47.8
164% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 108%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 37
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 116%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback