MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 228%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 03:50
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 338
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 1,239
113% 950 Pts
64-Core 2,290
142% 2,290 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 241
Parallax 278
234% 268 fps
MRender 294
Gravity 231
Splatting 169
182% 231 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 193%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,542
Write 2,408
Mixed 1,737
496% 2,229 MB/s
4K Read 65.6
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 91.7
304% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,388
DQ Write 1,202
DQ Mixed 1,266
957% 1,286 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
669GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 453 454 453 453 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 452
Mixed 402
SusWrite 453
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 46.8
161% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 107%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 82.3
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 38.2
155% 54.1 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 142%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback