Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 189 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 500 52% 415 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400 10,400 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.902.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.65% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 2 Parallax 2.3 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.2 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.65% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 196 83 84 85 83 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.9% Average	Read 204 Write 199 Mixed 176 SusWrite 122 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 28.3 97% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 60.4 DQ Mixed 37 31% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 95%
SAMSUNG HM641JI 640GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 202GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 29 Write 20.3 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 28.1 34% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 2x8GB 2,364 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.8% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.4 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.2 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	310x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	294x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	136x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $156