TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G9-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2_SKS
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime7 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 10:29
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 89
2-Core 178
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 381
46% 354 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 66.7%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1177) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.6% Good
Lighting 80.1
Reflection 105
Parallax 83.8
65% 89.8 fps
MRender 85.2
Gravity 84.5
Splatting 92.8
72% 87.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 67.6%
 Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 275 273 271 271 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 468
Write 306
Mixed 296
SusWrite 274
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 31.9
118% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 234
202% 300 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 86.4%
 Great: 126%
ENGFASAAPSTBT120GB 120GB
56GB free
Firmware: V2206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 81 82 56 55 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 302
Write 102
Mixed 296
SusWrite 99
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 21.1
97% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 137
133% 206 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 57.7%
 Great: 65%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
117GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 56 56 74 112 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 55
Write 69.2
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 75.2
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 37.5%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 77.6%
 Great: 82%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples316x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples208x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples6x
GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples453x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples80x
GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 47%, 22,284 samples1x
SSD
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples88x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples47x
CV1-8B256 256GBLiteonBench 77%, 8,101 samples46x
RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 11,019 samples112x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples104x
ACR24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 77%, 566 samples31x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback