MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '21 at 23:25
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 314
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 948
97% 786 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1553 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 65.9
50% 67.4 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 58.6
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_CT250MX200SSD6 250GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 307 309 310 311 310 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 477
Mixed 390
SusWrite 312
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48.2
174% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 258
224% 332 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Micron_M500_MTFDDAK960MAV 960GB
498GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 424 418 416 420 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 421
Mixed 327
SusWrite 420
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 37.7
143% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 184
176% 273 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 98%
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
56GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 146 146 143 144 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 438
Write 414
Mixed 345
SusWrite 166
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 42.8
156% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 188
169% 254 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 85%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
473GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 116 116 116 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 115
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
90% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 35.5
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 36.4
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback