Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 137 59% 97 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 435 41% 340 Pts	64-Core 431 27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52.5% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 62.2 52% 64.7 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 61.3 53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 150 150 157 159 159 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 332 Write 274 Mixed 278 SusWrite 148 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 45 144% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 224 168% 225 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 796GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 153 150 158 159 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 126 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 150 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL8-4GBXM F3-1600C9-4GAB F3-14900CL8-4GBXM F3-1600C9-4GAB 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.5% Average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 14.5 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.1 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	6x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494