Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSamsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 105
50% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 269
31% 239 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B6) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3501103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 104 428 413 389 383 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 462
Write 372
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 289
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 8.9
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 30.7
36% 67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 04CB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300V3A/300V4A/300V5A/200A4B/200A5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback