PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C31 |
Motherboard | MSI B365M PRO-VH (MS-7C31) (all builds) |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200604 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Apr 18 '21 at 19:35 |
Run Duration | 107 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 68 70 70 67 64 MB/s
|
42.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 859B BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,487x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 534x |
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 167x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 290x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 280x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 214x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $438 |