Lenovo 30AGS10606

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 30AGS10606 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '21 at 18:17
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 107 2-Core 194 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 581 53% 445 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 392.59 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 21.8 17% 20.1 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 23 Splatting 15.9 16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK512MBF 512GB 918 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 129 125 120 119 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 431 Write 182 Mixed 248 SusWrite 129 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 37.9 131% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 96.7 DQ Mixed 132 94% 121 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 104%
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB 3,843 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 0GB free Firmware: JULA1102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 480 Write 447 Mixed 426 101% 451 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 74.3 4K Mixed 41.1 131% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 52.6 112% 230 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 55GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 89 89 89 90 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 87.7 Write 86.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 87.3 59% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 69%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 6200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 19 19 20 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	9.57% Terrible	Read 20.3 Write 19.3 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 17.7 26% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.1 72% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.57% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB 3,888 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 18.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16