Biostar A880GZ

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A880GZ (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '21 at 07:27
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 83.4 1-Core 71 2-Core 133 59% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 214 28% 213 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 3288) 1GB CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 16.6 Reflection 17 Parallax 21.8 14% 18.5 fps	MRender 22.2 Gravity 21.2 Splatting 16.2 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.3% Average	Read 269 Write 163 Mixed 181 SusWrite 58.7 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 20 80% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 46.8 DQ Mixed 26.3 22% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 87%
WD WD2000JS-00MHB0 200GB 2,544 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 186GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 59 60 60 60 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 58.7 Write 56.5 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 59.6 40% 54.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 34%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 74GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 57 58 58 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 57.1 Mixed 39.1 SusWrite 56.9 38% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.8% Average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 11.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A880GZ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A880GZ

CPU
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	2x
Athlon II X3 450AMD $80Bench 44%, 4,468 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	3x
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x
HG6 128GBToshibaBench 79%, 5,641 samples	1x

RAM
9905403-441.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 108 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 9,885 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16