Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '17 at 16:03
Run Duration	343 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 69 1-Core 111 2-Core 214 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 742 66% 561 Pts	64-Core 1,180 73% 1,180 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 114 Parallax 105 89% 109 fps	MRender 95.9 Gravity 101 Splatting 100 81% 99 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 364GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 62 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 230278622	94.3% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 413 Mixed 419 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 24.4 132% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 67 93% 171 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 233GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4947 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 601 (B1) Unknown 98 98 27 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 48 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15481051790	93.6% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 413 Mixed 419 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 30.4 143% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 41.1 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 101 83% 113 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 2,007 Write 1,187 Mixed 1,128 318% 1,441 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 23.9 146% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 51.5 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 23.3 41% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 236%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 181 3358 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 893 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2756 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 333 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 875 (C2) HDA temperature 114 108 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	104% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 201 Mixed 167 132% 176 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.29 110% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 781GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2233 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 597 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5050 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 590 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 553 (C2) HDA temperature 112 105 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	99.2% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 164 Mixed 155 125% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.28 110% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 108%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 313GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 59.3 Write 54.3 Mixed 48.5 68% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.3 44% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 28%
WDC WD10 EZRX-00DC0B0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 247GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.1% Average	Read 110 Write 110 Mixed 77.4 124% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.24 88% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 228GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 49%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00KUWA0 1TB 25GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 25.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 20.7 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	978x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	419x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	389x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	492x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	279x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	154x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	88x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	259x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	129x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16