MSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 21:50
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 72
2-Core 131
62% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 278
33% 253 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 39.4
10% 30.7 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 28
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 33%
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 30.7
19% 28.7 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 21.5
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit DMT-80M6M-11 mSATA 80GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DMH110B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 158
Write 169
Mixed 134
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 21.1
71% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.3
DQ Write 46.4
DQ Mixed 28.8
24% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
174GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 132 132 132 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 145
Write 129
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 135
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36
269GB free
Firmware: V54OA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 70 66 70 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 66
Write 65.6
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 68.6
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G43 (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A-G43 (MS-7693) - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback