Alienware Aurora R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora R5  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 01NYPT
Memory14.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 16:06
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 234
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 620
63% 509 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Dell(1028 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.3% Very good
Lighting 89.1
Reflection 104
Parallax 93.4
73% 95.6 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 89.7
Splatting 92.8
75% 90.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cx2-8b256-q11 NVMe LITEON 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 48811QC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 271 260 265 251 258 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,266
Write 588
Mixed 594
SusWrite 268
150% 679 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53
188% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 586
456% 637 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 155%
Great: 208%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
397GB free
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 297 307 308 308 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 431
Write 392
Mixed 241
SusWrite 302
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 35.1
115% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 234
200% 296 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 108%
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
151GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 246 259 166 213 255 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 386
Write 262
Mixed 290
SusWrite 225
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 32.2
120% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 180
166% 255 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
574GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 178 181 180 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 141
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 176
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB
29GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.8 10 9.6 9.6 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 17.1
Write 7.2
Mixed 14.6
SusWrite 9.6
16% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3
172% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 20%
ST332062 0AS 320GB
176GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 35 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 18.9
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 33.9
37% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
1TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 33.5
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 4.4
32% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2133 C14 Series Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 1302 2133 C14 Series 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R5 Builds (Compare 1,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback