HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8259
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170123
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 06 '17 at 10:22
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 221
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 497
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8259) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4542
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.34% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 7.47
6% 7.37 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 15.7
10% 11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 2,035
Write 935
Mixed 1,118
299% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 43.3
190% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 59.5
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 149
97% 111 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 200%
Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 117
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.16
62% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC8T1-BQXS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 21.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback