Asus M2N68-AM Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N68-AM Plus  (all builds)
Memory0.1 GB free of 1.25 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100610
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 05:02
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3500+-$54
AM2, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 10.1
31% 34.5 Pts
4-Core 4.4
8-Core 14.6
1% 9.5 Pts
64-Core 20.1
1% 20.1 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
Asus(1043 83A4) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S SD S800 120G 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 55 33 20 27 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 110
SusWrite 35.5
22% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 4.5
36% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 58
DQ Mixed 14
18% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
256, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.25% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 0.3
3% 1 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0.1
SC Mixed 0.1
0% 0.07 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N68-AM Plus Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N68-AM Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback