HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2280
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 03:22
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 106
47% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 162
17% 136 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 830M
HP(103C 2280) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6611
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.4
6% 8.6 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 227 217 235 254 256 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 380
Write 338
Mixed 291
SusWrite 238
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 29.2
98% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 202
166% 236 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback