CMS 7200-5565A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemCMS 7200-5565A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 74.7
1-Core 157
2-Core 311
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 1,095
103% 855 Pts
64-Core 1,495
92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 144
Parallax 194
104% 155 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 138
Splatting 96
94% 117 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$83
58GB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,416
Write 1449
Mixed 1,262
376% 1,709 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 69.3
234% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 1,166
DQ Mixed 921
720% 977 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
532GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 69 131 148 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 103
Write 169
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 111
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN CT8G4DFRA266.C4FE 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 25.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5565A Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: CMS 7200-5565A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback