Asrock X79 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140213
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '17 at 03:11
Run Duration	566 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 170 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 561 55% 451 Pts	64-Core 691 43% 691 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% PowerColor(148C 2357) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1525 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.6.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Lighting 77.2 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 89.8 63% 77.6 fps	MRender 64.4 Gravity 60 Splatting 82.5 58% 69 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 500GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 469 Mixed 482 108% 483 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 90.1 4K Mixed 48.4 162% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 128 143% 244 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 123%
Crucial_CT525MX3 525GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 133GB free Firmware: R040 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 484 Mixed 487 108% 484 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 34.2 128% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 64.3 107% 207 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 98%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 18GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1665 (03) Spinup time 182 178 5900 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2575 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 10969 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 501 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 37 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 173 173 81784 (C2) HDA temperature 123 108 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	81.3% Excellent	Read 164 Write 119 Mixed 110 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.25 81% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 83%
Hitachi HDP72505 500GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 5GB free Firmware: A52A Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 82.8 Write 81.3 Mixed 81.5 62% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.44 106% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 51%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2GB free Firmware: 0-50 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 36.3 Write 55.1 Mixed 43.9 34% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.37 84% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 38%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 99 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897681603 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3293 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20236 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 943 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3499 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3499 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 236223594524 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.9% Average	Read 72.4 Write 101 Mixed 11.5 45% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.31 74% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 76%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 95.6 Write 91.5 Mixed 61.2 103% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.28 70% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 21.4 Write 16.9 Mixed 38.2 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.19 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 751GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 81.4 Write 76.6 Mixed 71.8 98% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.23 83% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 47%
MAL31000 SA-W72 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 272GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.8% Below average	Read 91.2 Write 85.3 Mixed 8.06 70% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.31 88% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 40%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 198GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 70.2 Write 59.6 Mixed 71.2 86% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.24 85% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 47%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 109GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 51.2 Write 66.5 Mixed 21.5 58% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.28 58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 40%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 106GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 141 Write 160 Mixed 17.4 126% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.28 64% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 69%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 70GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 91.5 Write 66.3 Mixed 77 97% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.32 46% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 63%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B0 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 18GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.6% Poor	Read 41.9 Write 42 Mixed 39.8 53% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.26 69% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 22%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 6GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 69.3 Write 88 Mixed 46.5 87% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.41 59% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 38.3 MC Mixed 34.6 106% 37.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11.3 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme4 - $290

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	87x
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	51x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	25x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	23x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GBSamsungBench 201%, 5,877 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 52%, 780 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GBCrucialBench 43%, 2,652 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 2x8GBCorsairBench 44%, 2,237 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $818

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16