Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '17 at 01:30
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 207 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 414 56% 414 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.6.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 59.7 Parallax 80.4 54% 68.8 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 54.2 Splatting 77.5 54% 63.7 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB 21,984 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 117GB free Firmware: 3.2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2234 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1349 (A5) Unknown 100 100 234636 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 60 (AE) Unknown 100 100 234 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 42 292057972778 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 200 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 205 (F1) Unknown 100 100 8331160640 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6181248123	52.2% Above average	Read 444 Write 309 Mixed 318 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 9.18 49% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 37.9 DQ Write 18.3 DQ Mixed 10.3 12% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 56%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 664 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 364 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 11 (AE) Unknown 100 100 90 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 39 261993463851 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 5356011235 (F7) Unknown 100 100 167770741 (F8) Unknown 100 100 135926534 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1929 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	84.8% Excellent	Read 474 Write 328 Mixed 334 84% 379 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 26.5 114% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 47.9 93% 189 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 75GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 165 2450 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1527 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2397 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1520 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 253 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2536 (C2) HDA temperature 103 78 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	96.8% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 148 Mixed 112 112% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.23 94% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905599-020.A00G 1x8GB 550 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 70.7 56% 70.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	733x
Core i3-7100Intel $38Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	483x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	307x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	457x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	398x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	256x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	269x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	132x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	122x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	131x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16