HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 87C3
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201208
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '21 at 19:16
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 78.4 1-Core 146 2-Core 291 92% 172 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 858 86% 698 Pts	64-Core 1,327 82% 1,327 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.1% Below average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 39 Parallax 44.9 36% 42.9 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 40.1 38% 48.3 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB 9,143 User benchmarks, average bench 140% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,429 Write 901 Mixed 884 237% 1,071 MB/s	4K Read 46 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 47.9 158% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 670 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 239 216% 344 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 190%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 671GB free Firmware: MS2OA8L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 161 171 171 148 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 151 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 156 91% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8ME-8XR 2x8GB 1,338 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 31.3 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 30.2 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 177%

UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,582x
Core i9-10850KIntel $279Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	1,309x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	750x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,707x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	806x
RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	575x

SSD
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TBWDCBench 236%, 4,202 samples	920x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TBWDCBench 191%, 10,094 samples	811x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples	557x

RAM
HP32D4U8D8HC-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 1,949 samples	848x
HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 84%, 3,401 samples	604x
HP32D4U8D8HC-16XR 2x16GBKingstonBench 98%, 1,304 samples	499x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16