Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 05:07
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 70.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 272
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 834
84% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
PNY(196E 11D9) 3GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 61.6
53% 64.6 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 62.7
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,193
Write 3,536
Mixed 2,245
598% 2,658 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 85.5
286% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 1,014
DQ Mixed 941
760% 1,079 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
98GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 91 101 115 115 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 240
Write 376
Mixed 312
SusWrite 126
60% 264 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 17.7
95% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 29.2
64% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 86%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
184GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 463 463 464 443 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 453
Mixed 417
SusWrite 457
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 32.4
106% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 239
175% 231 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 97%
OWC Merc ury Electra 6G S 480GB
192GB free
Firmware: 7101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 341 340 342 342 344 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.8% Good
Read 392
Write 341
Mixed 293
SusWrite 341
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 23.1
76% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 159
128% 182 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate BUP Slim 1TB
325GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 91 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
44% Average
Read 61.4
Write 95.5
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 91.7
61% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 44%
Great: 71%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
53GB free, PID 0754
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 90 73 68 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 164
Write 18.4
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 75.8
79% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.3
105% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.5% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 30.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 30.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback