MSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788)

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7788
Motherboard	MSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788) (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131018
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '21 at 22:18
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 148 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 226 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 7788) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.38% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 1 Splatting 2 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.38% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 128GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0722A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 78 51 26 78 31 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 241 Write 211 Mixed 210 SusWrite 61.9 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 11.1 41% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 44.5 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 15.9 15% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 40%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 51GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 85 87 88 89 88 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 80.4 Write 89.7 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 84.9 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 62%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.5 4.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Read 10.5 Write 2.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 4.3 5% 4.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BD160BJ.C8F 2x4GB 573 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 18 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 15.4 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788)

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	7x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	6x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	10x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
S200 60GBKingdianBench 47%, 737 samples	2x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16