Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 149 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 232 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 0511) 2GB CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 15.8 Reflection 28.4 Parallax 21.7 13% 22 fps	MRender 26.8 Gravity 16.1 Splatting 24.8 19% 22.6 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK60A9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 78 26 56 55 35 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.4% Average	Read 197 Write 155 Mixed 147 SusWrite 74.2 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 21.4 86% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.8 DQ Write 48.6 DQ Mixed 25.2 23% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 36GB free Firmware: 3.43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	29% Poor	Read 52 Write 11.8 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 48.9 27% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.57 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $280

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16