MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160715
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 05 '17 at 14:58
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 149
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 553
51% 426 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8555) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 22% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 632
Write 533
Mixed 587
130% 584 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 37.2
118% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 137
144% 239 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 108%
Great: 144%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
956GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 153
Write 150
Mixed 161
117% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.2
103% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 108%
Asmt 2105 500GB
356GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 102
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 67%
ORICO H/ W RAID1 3TB
529GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
Read 116
Write 126
Mixed 88.1
140% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%
ADATA HV620 500GB
395GB free, PID a31a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 103
Write 91.5
Mixed 69.6
109% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.21
20% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 500GB
203GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 71.4
116% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.25
73% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 41%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 128GB
98GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 131
Write 57.7
Mixed 117
123% 102 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.09
122% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 34.9
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 14.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 99%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback