Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	45.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '17 at 14:30
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 83 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 188 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 597 60% 485 Pts	64-Core 705 44% 705 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 3000) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Lighting 34.2 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 39.9 28% 35.1 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 35.6 32% 40 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139 1,753 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1897 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 641 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 196 196 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 112 (C2) HDA temperature 67 47 227634184225	31.3% Below average	Read 254 Write 97 Mixed 127 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 6.06 50% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 21.8 DQ Mixed 5.96 9% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 90%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -0 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 11GB free, PID 0306 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 84.7 Write 12.3 Mixed 22.6 37% 39.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.05 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 1.65 150% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273DH0- M391B5273DH0- M391B5273DH0- M391B5273DH0- Kingston 99U5471-056.A Kingston 9905471-064.A Kingston 9905471-064.A Kingston 9905471-064.A 48GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89.4% Excellent	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 33.3 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16