Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150904
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '21 at 05:51
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 72.1 2-Core 128 58% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 283 32% 249 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 22,284 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.1% Average	Lighting 60 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 53.7 49% 58.4 fps	MRender 64.6 Gravity 53.7 Splatting 53.5 46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 64 3.2 29 100 73 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.7% Below average	Read 231 Write 187 Mixed 149 SusWrite 71.6 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 14.7 60% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 67.7 DQ Mixed 27.4 37% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 53%
Asrock RAM Disk 0GB 0GB free Firmware: 1.00 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 2,962 Write 2611 Mixed 2,713 616% 2,762 MB/s	4K Read 221 4K Write 191 4K Mixed 202 695% 205 MB/s	DQ Read 566 DQ Write 479 DQ Mixed 516 389% 520 MB/s

Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 102GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 4.3 12 14 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 29.4 Write 20.5 Mixed 2.3 SusWrite 10.5 18% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 18% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	50x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	30x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	12x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	5x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,343 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16