Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 01:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 98.1
2-Core 193
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 359
49% 362 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 32.2
19% 27.7 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 25.9
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 120GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 87 103 135 155 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 450
Write 396
Mixed 350
SusWrite 123
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 4.1
83% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 175
136% 183 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 182 184 185 185 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 180
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 180
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
118% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-056.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback