Asrock X58 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X58 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '17 at 23:00
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 98.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 513
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
PwrHis(1787 0B00) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 14.6
14% 15.2 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 17.4
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hfs512g3 2MND-3210A 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65% Good
Read 385
Write 233
Mixed 293
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 21.9
91% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 0.94
48% 116 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
378GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 94.1
Mixed 58.5
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.32
109% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 44.3
90% 44.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback