HP 27-p019nb

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 27-p019nb (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B3E
Memory	5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161011
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '21 at 09:15
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700T 9,225 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 156 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 421 44% 354 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 2B3E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.5% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 6.9 5% 7.73 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 9.9 6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.5% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 229 257 232 258 251 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 1,893 Write 1,164 Mixed 973 SusWrite 280 238% 1,078 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 28.6 103% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 42.6 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 5.7 10% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 302%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 419GB free Firmware: M3CR032 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 300 345 305 323 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 388 Write 251 Mixed 325 SusWrite 327 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 25.7 92% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 36.5 DQ Write 46.6 DQ Mixed 52.5 37% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 125%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 640GB free Firmware: 0604 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 36 39 35 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 37.4 Write 35.8 Mixed 30 SusWrite 37.9 26% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 129 118 129 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 52.3 Write 75.2 Mixed 70.1 SusWrite 124 60% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.5 175% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 94%
WD My Book 25EE 14TB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 146 166 147 162 168 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 147 Write 141 Mixed 156 SusWrite 159 208% 151 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 3.2 248% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 103%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 440GB free, PID 1019 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 35 39 34 39 39 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 38.3 Write 30.4 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 37.4 47% 35.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF186D.M16 2x8GB 1,504 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	60.1% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 20 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 16.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 27-p019nb

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)