Dell Latitude E7250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E7250  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170801
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '21 at 07:45
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 233
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Dell(1028 062D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 6.7
4% 6.63 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6.5
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LMH-128V2M-11 MSATA 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FM7110C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 119 120 124 127 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 510
Write 121
Mixed 228
SusWrite 124
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 44.5
141% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 104
114% 196 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KN2M64-MIN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 19.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7250 Builds (Compare 1,096 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback