Asus PRIME A320M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 113
50% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 228
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 62.1
53% 64.9 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 64
54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 119 107 152 168 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 176
Mixed 111
SusWrite 141
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.6
323% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
104GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66% Good
Read 120
Write 75.6
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 110
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 176 189 187 188 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 152
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 185
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
179GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 69.2
Mixed 67
SusWrite 108
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
466GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 167 179 176 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 149
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 173
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback