Gigabyte GA-Sabre 15WV8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Sabre 15WV8  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180810
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 12:13
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 240
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 608
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8500) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 40
Parallax 6.2
4% 17.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE510T 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0213A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 106 117 103 63 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1,443
Write 23.6
Mixed 520
SusWrite 102
112% 522 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 6.9
88% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 10.4
93% 219 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 186%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
419GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 104 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 105
62% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD24D4S7D8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Sabre 15WV8 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Sabre 15WV8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback