Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LU
Memory14.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateApr 11 '21 at 08:16
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 203
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 567
55% 452 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 18DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 45% Great: 72%
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 18DF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 7.7
6% 35 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,355
Write 913
Mixed 958
238% 1,075 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 48.9
184% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 571
439% 598 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 189%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
112GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 88 88 89 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 47.5
Write 71.2
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 89.7
50% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 71%
ASMT 2115 960GB
84GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 41.3
Write 40
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 39.2
53% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 8.6
744% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 7.8
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 9.3
726% 9.43 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 176%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Kingston 9905700-046.A00G 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU Builds (Compare 980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LU_FX506LU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback