Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 172% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X399-A (all builds)
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181012
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 10 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Memory 76.5 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 83% 153 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 973 88% 739 Pts	64-Core 2,469 153% 2,469 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Gigabyte(1458 37B9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Lighting 229 Reflection 210 Parallax 247 187% 229 fps	MRender 271 Gravity 229 Splatting 176 179% 225 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,426 Write 1,408 Mixed 996 353% 1,610 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 74.4 252% 86.7 MB/s	DQ Read 964 DQ Write 750 DQ Mixed 846 636% 853 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 195 197 198 196 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 163 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 197 103% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.9 351% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%
Maxtor 6L200M0 199GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 185GB free Firmware: BANC1G10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 48 48 48 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 52 Write 49.4 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 48.5 34% 45.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.3 131% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$192 7,103 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	190% Outstanding	MC Read 73.7 MC Write 85.5 MC Mixed 69 217% 76.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 45.1 SC Mixed 31.3 94% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	185x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	124x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	33x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	24x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	22x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $913

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16