Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 15:13
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User SLV-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 275
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 873
87% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 59.8
49% 59.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 49%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1316 1226 1230 1218 1218 1229 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,571
Write 1,678
Mixed 1,650
SusWrite 1,239
398% 1,784 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 69.8
229% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 521
431% 626 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 280%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
315GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 428 426 437 439 438 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 457
Mixed 414
SusWrite 433
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 52.3
168% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
300GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 453 453 453 454 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 453
Mixed 348
SusWrite 452
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 42.1
142% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 187
145% 200 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
257GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 169 165 167 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 99.5
Write 93.4
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 166
70% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
196% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
290GB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 177 176 179 170 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 141
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 175
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 34.1
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 35.2
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,026
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback