To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 09:19
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 196
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 497
51% 413 Pts
64-Core 494
30% 494 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 39
Parallax 55.2
35% 45.6 fps
MRender 55.9
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 41.8
40% 50 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1339 1425 969 972 979 982 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,500
Write 1,736
Mixed 1,484
SusWrite 1,111
329% 1,458 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 52.4
175% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 530
386% 506 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 204%
Great: 429%
OCZ CACHE-RVHY 100GB
93GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 125 124 124 125 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 350
Write 144
Mixed 170
SusWrite 122
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 27.5
96% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 130
99% 134 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 65%
Toshiba MK1059GS 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: GU00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 74 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 74.1
Write 50.9
Mixed 25
SusWrite 74.6
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 50%
2-Power SSD2042B 256GB
89GB free, PID 202a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
Read 29
Write 24.8
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 25.4
36% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 6.5
506% 7.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback