HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8560w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1631
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140804
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 01:33
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 151
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 211
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
HP(103C 1631) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 311.43
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GKH84-128GB 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0115G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 83 136 86 137 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 462
Write 137
Mixed 182
SusWrite 111
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 21
73% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 92.4
73% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback