TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H170-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory44.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170307
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 10:15
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 680
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 79.8%
 Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.49
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.5 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 11%
 Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1573 1653 1630 1520 1637 1659 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,239
Write 1,615
Mixed 1,268
SusWrite 1,612
377% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 75.5
260% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 1,100
836% 1,131 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑
This bench: 319%
 Great: 425%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
149GB free
Firmware: 2BA30004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 96 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 63.8
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 94.1
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 55.7%
 Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
16GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 5.2 7.6 7.2 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 77.3
Write 11.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 6.1
26% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
37% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 14.9%
 Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C12D4/16GX KHX2133C14/8G KHX2400C12D4/16GX KHX2133C14/8G 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 73%
 Great: 74%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H170-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel  $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples81x
Core i5-6500Intel  $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples64x
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples56x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples65x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples25x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples24x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples9x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples9x
RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX  $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples22x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback