Asus M4N68T-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4N68T-M LE  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110705
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 08:54
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 88.4
40% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 48 51 48 51 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 230
Write 176
Mixed 101
SusWrite 51.7
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 13.9
60% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 47.7
DQ Mixed 10.1
16% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
568GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 177 173 174 173 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 159
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 174
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA 500GB
384GB free
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 117 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 102
Write 108
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 117
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T-M LE Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback