Asus M32CD

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150828
Uptime	12.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '21 at 18:22
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 200 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 496 51% 410 Pts	64-Core 607 38% 607 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 44.6 Reflection 49 Parallax 39.4 36% 44.3 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 27.9 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 375 398 370 367 217 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 391 Write 366 Mixed 368 SusWrite 349 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 56 192% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 262 216% 310 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 123%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: A7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 185 189 190 190 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 185 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 188 109% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.6% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 18.7 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 22.1 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $74Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	188x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	87x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	9x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	51x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
MX500 1TBCrucial $86Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	64x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 4,871 samples	23x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GBSamsungBench 58%, 63 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $102

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16