Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH560
Memory	53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '21 at 07:53
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 228 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 638 67% 535 Pts	64-Core 961 60% 961 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 200F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 116 Parallax 6.6 4% 42.7 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 9 6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 164GB free Firmware: CQA0904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 425 291 289 267 257 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,285 Write 1,647 Mixed 1233 SusWrite 352 254% 1,129 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 82.9 4K Mixed 53.8 177% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 868 DQ Write 676 DQ Mixed 768 576% 771 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 249%
Sabrent Rocket Q 4TB 450 User benchmarks, average bench 308% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT30Q.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1885 1044 362 761 655 439 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 989 Write 1954 Mixed 1,186 SusWrite 858 283% 1,247 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 51.4 162% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 869 DQ Write 675 DQ Mixed 780 581% 775 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 403%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 74GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 56 76 78 76 78 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 115 Write 76.2 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 73.6 109% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.4 294% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 24.6 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 20.8 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	739x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	337x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	211x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	181x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	321x
CA5-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 181%, 641 samples	185x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	221x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	174x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	102x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16