Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH560
Memory	53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '21 at 07:45
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 89.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 248 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 711 67% 554 Pts	64-Core 977 60% 977 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 200F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	5.31% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 120 Parallax 7.4 4% 44.3 fps	MRender 9.2 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 10.2 7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.31% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 164GB free Firmware: CQA0904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 554 276 278 281 601 424 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,398 Write 128 Mixed 952 SusWrite 402 158% 720 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 53.7 169% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 871 DQ Write 688 DQ Mixed 766 577% 775 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 249%
Sabrent Rocket Q 4TB 450 User benchmarks, average bench 308% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT30Q.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1549 427 429 870 526 548 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	173% Outstanding	Read 970 Write 2069 Mixed 1,202 SusWrite 725 282% 1,242 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 55.4 178% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 858 DQ Write 701 DQ Mixed 786 587% 782 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 403%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 74GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 77 79 77 78 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	52% Above average	Read 116 Write 75.5 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 77.9 107% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.4 296% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73% Very good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 21.6 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 25.1 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	739x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	337x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	211x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	181x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	321x
CA5-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 181%, 641 samples	185x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	221x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	174x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	102x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16