Asus PRIME B250M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 17:41
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 216
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 635
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3570 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.2% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 106
Parallax 119
96% 114 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 108
Splatting 101
88% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 106%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 8
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.6
7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 1140 1156 1154 1138 1106 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,550
Write 1,444
Mixed 742
SusWrite 1,128
272% 1,216 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60.2
203% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,084
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 950
726% 986 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 238%
Great: 302%
SanDisk X300s SATA M.2 256GB
207GB free
Firmware: X2170002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 402 407 410 416 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 396
Mixed 235
SusWrite 404
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 32
118% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 150
157% 259 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 98%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
393GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 429 430 430 438 451 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 411
Mixed 367
SusWrite 427
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 54.3
173% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 327
247% 331 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B250M-A Builds (Compare 4,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-A - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback